|
|
Childcare products for all?
Lindsey
is Principal Researcher at Ricability (Research Institute for Consumer
Affairs), London, UK. For more information contact: Ricability. Tel:
020 7427 2460 Ricability's three-year project – assessing five different, mainstream childcare products – has identified only a handful of models that can be easily used by parents with disabilities. Dozens of products – from feeding bottles to pushchairs – are unnecessarily difficult to use. When will mainstream baby product manufacturers start to design with all parents in mind? The projectRicability is an independent research charity producing information for disabled consumers. In 2002 Ricability, with help from DPPI and Disabled Parents Network, got funding from the Nuffield Foundation and the Department of Health to assess a range of mainstream childcare products for their ease of use by parents with disabilities. Our project involved:
The results of this research have been published as five Ricability buying guides. All are downloadable from our website or available by post for an A4 stamped addressed envelope (UK postage 47p for one copy, £1.48 for five; see left for contact details) and on audiocassette and in Braille. What we foundThe Ricability childcare guides are there to help parents with disabilities to choose products that are likely to suit their needs: see the reviews of some of the guides in issue numbers 41, 42 and 48 of this journal. However, both Ricability and the disabled testers have been disappointed in the too wide range of features that hinder rather than help them to use childcare products. Our guides concentrate on what to look for. Here are lists of some of the features to avoid. Baby carriers
Bottles, warmers and sterilisers
Safety gates
Highchairs
Pushchairs
Achieving better designAs each of the Ricability guides has been published, we have sent copies to all the manufacturers and suppliers, hoping the contents of our reports will encourage and help them to develop their products to suit more potential customers. Discouragingly, none of these manufacturers has asked for more details of inclusive design principles. At any opportunity, we promote the commercial arguments for inclusive design: meet the needs of more parents and sales will increase; excluding potential purchasers is clearly bad business; build in inclusive design from product conception for no or negligible cost; it does not strangle innovation but encourages innovative design solutions. Design colleges are increasingly addressing ease of use issues in their courses and some are working with a wider range of consumers to inform product development. Train young designers in the needs of disabled people and that awareness should influence all their future work. Unfortunately legislation does not help. The Disability Discrimination Act 1995 does not cover manufactured products. However, it does now require products supplied as part of a service to be accessible. This should contribute to the needed culture change towards inclusivity. There are also developments in international and European standardisation. Product standards cover performance and safety and manufacturers across the world build to comply with them. Awareness-raising and informative guidelines have recently been issued to assist standards developers to help them address the needs of older and disabled people. Childcare products that exclude disabled parents are unacceptable. Therapists and disabled people have a part to play in rejecting unhelpful products and being vociferous in their demands for models that disabled parents can use easily. Next: Bulletin board |